Sep 18, 2005, 06:11 PM // 18:11
|
#1
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
|
Random "Tombs" Team Track
Just like there is a Competition Arena that eventually leads to the Teams Arena, why is there no random Tombs option?
It would eliminate the wait to play and might be just as likely to succeed. (Considering how may player drops occur in PUG teams.)
Besides if it was facing other random teams up to a set level of maps, it would even be just as competitive and at least as fun.
|
|
|
Sep 18, 2005, 06:18 PM // 18:18
|
#2
|
Wilds Pathfinder
|
erm, a unorginized 8v8 is just stupid.
|
|
|
Sep 18, 2005, 06:20 PM // 18:20
|
#3
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In a World of BADGERS!
Guild: Eternal Flame Brotherhood
|
hehehe
when i go to Tombs i start my group of 'unorganised no-hopers'.
we got through 3 rounds once... then we met spirit spam......
|
|
|
Sep 19, 2005, 02:24 AM // 02:24
|
#4
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
|
How is it "stupid"? If you are teamed against a like team?
You ever play in a PUG? What's different except the time you have to stand around waiting to get a team together??
|
|
|
Sep 19, 2005, 02:29 AM // 02:29
|
#5
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chicago
Guild: Idiot Savants [iQ]
Profession: Mo/
|
random teams are kind of like those blind invites you get when in districts. hey, sure you get to play, but a team like that will never suceed. i think anet wants more competitive teams in tombs and teams that dont really care too much about winning in other arenas.
|
|
|
Sep 19, 2005, 03:12 AM // 03:12
|
#6
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Profession: E/Rt
|
I have a more detailed and similar suggestion in sanitarium. Read my post titled "Random Tombs"
Basically its a seperate random tombs arena like you said, but with a simple party matching process designed to ensure the maximum variety in classes in party. So although its random, it's trying to ensure that every party has as many different classes represented as possible.
Is it "optimal" ? Of course not. Optimal parties often have several monks, or IWAY etc. But since we're facing similar parties, it's fair, and it makes parties more likely to be balanced enough for good gameplay with a variety of tactics available.
|
|
|
Sep 19, 2005, 09:10 AM // 09:10
|
#7
|
Pre-Searing Cadet
Join Date: Sep 2005
Guild: MfG
|
f r e e f a m e
bad idea
|
|
|
Sep 19, 2005, 04:02 PM // 16:02
|
#8
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Thornhill, ON, CAN
|
free fame? that's if your team wins actually! remember your team is random and can be just as bad! I don't care if they give fame or not but just want the option for massive battles. the competition and team arenas of 4 vs 4 are not as fun as the chaos you run into in 8 vs 8 or the (8v8v8v8v8v8) which totally rocks.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:06 AM // 02:06.
|